The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Opus vs Kimi-k1.5

Kimi-k1.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 17.2 to 9.9.

Anthropic · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi-k1.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 17.2 to 9.9, ranking #224 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi-k1.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Opus

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 17.2 and ranks #224 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
9.9
#273
17.2
#224
9.8
#267
16.4
#221
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3 Opus
Kimi-k1.5
16.1#211
20.2#161
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Opus · 9 for Kimi-k1.5

1 shared

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi-k1.5 is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3 Opus and Kimi-k1.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20.

Kimi-k1.5 is 11 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.6 years ago

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Opus and Kimi-k1.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Opus
✓ Preferred
Kimi-k1.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs Kimi-k1.5.

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Kimi-k1.5?

Kimi-k1.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 17.2 to 9.9. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Kimi-k1.5 in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and Kimi-k1.5?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and Kimi-k1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Opus and Kimi-k1.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (9.9 vs 17.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and Kimi-k1.5?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI.