Model Comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 2400.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 7 benchmarks (ARC-C, GPQA, GSM8k, HellaSwag, MATH, MGSM, MMLU), while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jun 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Opus ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1500.0x more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ($0.01/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Opus ($75.00/1M tokens) is 3750.0x more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ($0.02/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3 Opus is more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jun 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.01
Output tokens$0.02
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Opus accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3 Opus can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Jun 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.2 3B Instruct does not.

Claude 3 Opus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 7 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.3 years ago

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.7 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Opus is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

Claude 3 Opus

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.01/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.02/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher ARC-C score (96.4% vs 78.6%)
Higher GPQA score (50.4% vs 32.8%)
Higher GSM8k score (95.0% vs 77.7%)
Higher HellaSwag score (95.4% vs 69.8%)
Higher MATH score (60.1% vs 48.0%)
Higher MGSM score (90.7% vs 58.2%)
Higher MMLU score (86.8% vs 63.4%)
Meta
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Llama 3.2 3B Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct scores NIH/Multi-needle: 84.7%, ARC-C: 78.6%, GSM8k: 77.7%, IFEval: 77.4%, HellaSwag: 69.8%.

Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 1500.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.01/M input and $0.02/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.01/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.2 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is developed by Meta.