Claude 3 Opus vs Phi 4 Reasoning Comparison
Comparing Claude 3 Opus and Phi 4 Reasoning across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).
Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.
Claude 3 Opus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3 Opus
Phi 4 Reasoning
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.
Phi 4 Reasoning is 14 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.
Feb 29, 2024
2.1 years ago
Apr 30, 2025
10 months ago
1.2yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date.
—
Mar 2025
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Opus
View detailsAnthropic
Phi 4 Reasoning
View detailsMicrosoft
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|