The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Claude 3 Opus and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct are closely matched at 9.9 and 7.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3 Opus and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 9.9 and 7.7.

The models split the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Opus

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output

Choose Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
9.9
#273
7.7
#290
9.8
#267
7.2
#289
5.1
#208
9.4
#178
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 8
4 of 8
Input price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude 3 Opus
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
16.1#211
16.4#207
14.3#129
9.3#151
14.3#113
9.1#135
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Opus · 18 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

8 shared

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 4 benchmarks (ARC-C, GPQA, HellaSwag, MMLU), while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

Claude 3 Opus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is 7 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.6 years ago

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Opus and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Opus
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Claude 3 Opus and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 9.9 and 7.7. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Opus and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (9.9 vs 7.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.