Model Comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Granite 3.3 8B Base

Claude 3 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Claude 3 Sonnet outperforms in 6 benchmarks (ARC-C, BIG-Bench Hard, DROP, GSM8k, HellaSwag, MMLU), while Granite 3.3 8B Base is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval).

Claude 3 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3 Sonnet and Granite 3.3 8B Base support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Granite 3.3 8B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Sonnet was released on 2024-02-29, while Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16.

Granite 3.3 8B Base is 14 months newer than Claude 3 Sonnet.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Feb 29, 2024

2.2 years ago

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.1 years ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Claude 3 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Sonnet

—

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (93.2% vs 50.8%)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (82.9% vs 69.1%)
Higher DROP score (78.9% vs 36.1%)
Higher GSM8k score (92.3% vs 59.0%)
Higher HellaSwag score (89.0% vs 80.1%)
Higher MMLU score (79.0% vs 63.9%)
IBM
Has open weights
Higher HumanEval score (89.7% vs 73.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Sonnet vs Granite 3.3 8B Base.

Which is better, Claude 3 Sonnet or Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Claude 3 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3 Sonnet compare to Granite 3.3 8B Base in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Sonnet scores ARC-C: 93.2%, GSM8k: 92.3%, HellaSwag: 89.0%, MGSM: 83.5%, BIG-Bench Hard: 82.9%. Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Sonnet and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Claude 3 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Granite 3.3 8B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Sonnet and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Sonnet and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Claude 3 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM.