Claude 3 Sonnet vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct Comparison

Comparing Claude 3 Sonnet and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Claude 3 Sonnet outperforms in 4 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, DROP, GSM8k, MMLU), while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval).

Claude 3 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3 Sonnet is more expensive than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerReplicate
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3 Sonnet and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Sonnet was released on 2024-02-29, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 14 months newer than Claude 3 Sonnet.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Feb 29, 2024

2.0 years ago

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

11 months ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Claude 3 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available from Replicate. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

replicate logo
Replicate
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (82.9% vs 69.1%)
Higher DROP score (78.9% vs 59.4%)
Higher GSM8k score (92.3% vs 80.9%)
Higher MMLU score (79.0% vs 65.5%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher HumanEval score (89.7% vs 73.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct