The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Phi 4 Reasoning leads the LLM Stats Score 12.3 to 1.9.

Anthropic · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning leads the overall LLM Stats Score 12.3 to 1.9, ranking #242 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Phi 4 Reasoning wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Sonnet

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning

  • overall performance matters — it scores 12.3 and ranks #242 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
1.9
#307
12.3
#242
1.8
#296
12.8
#230
-1.4
#239
6.5
#182
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3 Sonnet
Phi 4 Reasoning
7.7#256
13.9#215
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Sonnet · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning

2 shared

Claude 3 Sonnet outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

Claude 3 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Sonnet was released on 2024-02-29, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Reasoning is 14 months newer than Claude 3 Sonnet.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Feb 29, 2024

2.5 years ago

Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Claude 3 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Sonnet and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Sonnet vs Phi 4 Reasoning.

Which is better, Claude 3 Sonnet or Phi 4 Reasoning?

Phi 4 Reasoning leads the LLM Stats Score 12.3 to 1.9. Claude 3 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Sonnet compare to Phi 4 Reasoning in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Sonnet scores ARC-C: 93.2%, GSM8k: 92.3%, HellaSwag: 89.0%, MGSM: 83.5%, BIG-Bench Hard: 82.9%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Sonnet and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Claude 3 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Sonnet and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (1.9 vs 12.3), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Sonnet and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Claude 3 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.