The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched at 2.0 and 3.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 2.0 and 3.9.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Sonnet

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 7 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
2.0
#306
3.9
#292
1.9
#295
3.3
#289
-1.4
#238
4.0
#205
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 7
6 of 7
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude 3 Sonnet
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
7.7#255
10.7#242
3.4#172
5.4#164
3.4#161
6.0#145
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Sonnet · 16 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

7 shared

Claude 3 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (ARC-C), while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Claude 3 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Sonnet was released on 2024-02-29, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is 7 months newer than Claude 3 Sonnet.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Feb 29, 2024

2.5 years ago

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Which is better, Claude 3 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 2.0 and 3.9. Claude 3 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Sonnet compare to Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Sonnet scores ARC-C: 93.2%, GSM8k: 92.3%, HellaSwag: 89.0%, MGSM: 83.5%, BIG-Bench Hard: 82.9%. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Claude 3 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.0 vs 3.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Claude 3 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.