The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B are closely matched at 1.9 and 5.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 1.9 and 5.3.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3 Sonnet wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Sonnet

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
1.9
#307
5.3
#286
1.8
#296
1.6
#298
-1.4
#239
1.2
#226
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 5
2 of 5
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3 Sonnet
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.7#256
5.5#264
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Sonnet · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

5 shared

Claude 3 Sonnet outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH).

Claude 3 Sonnet has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Sonnet was released on 2024-02-29, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is 13 months newer than Claude 3 Sonnet.

Claude 3 Sonnet

Feb 29, 2024

2.5 years ago

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.4 years ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Claude 3 Sonnet or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 1.9 and 5.3. Claude 3 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Sonnet compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Sonnet scores ARC-C: 93.2%, GSM8k: 92.3%, HellaSwag: 89.0%, MGSM: 83.5%, BIG-Bench Hard: 82.9%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Claude 3 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (1.9 vs 5.3), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Claude 3 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.