The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 57.0 to 14.9. Llama 4 Maverick is 72.1x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 57.0 to 14.9, ranking #1 overall.

On price, Llama 4 Maverick is roughly 72.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 57.0 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Llama 4 Maverick

  • cost matters — it's about 72.1x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
57.0
#1
14.9
#220
Reasoning
54.5
#4
14.6
#217
Coding
37.0
#17
3.2
#210
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$10.00 / M
$0.17 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Fable 5.1
Llama 4 Maverick
Vision
40.8#1
13.2#93
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 13 for Llama 4 Maverick

No common benchmarks found

Claude Fable 5.1 and Llama 4 Maverickdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

For input processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 58.8x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.17/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 83.3x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Fable 5.1 is more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input tokens$0.17
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Claude Fable 5.1 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Fable 5.1 and Llama 4 Maverick support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Fable 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Maverick

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Fable 5.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Maverick uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Fable 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05.

Claude Fable 5.1 is 17 months newer than Llama 4 Maverick.

Claude Fable 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

1 days ago

1.4yr newer
Llama 4 Maverick

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Fable 5.1 is available from Anthropic. Llama 4 Maverick is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Lambda, Groq, Fireworks, Together, Sambanova.

Claude Fable 5.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Llama 4 Maverick

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.63/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.79/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and Llama 4 Maverick side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5.1
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Maverick
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 57.0 to 14.9. Claude Fable 5.1 is made by Anthropic and Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Fable 5.1 compare to Llama 4 Maverick in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores OSWorld 2.0: 77.9%, CursorBench v3.2: 73.4%, Humanity's Last Exam: 65.0%, GDPval-AA: 61.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 55.8%. Llama 4 Maverick scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 92.3%, ChartQA: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 80.5%.

Is Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is 58.8x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5.1 and Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5.1 and Llama 4 Maverick?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (57.0 vs 14.9), input pricing ($10.00 vs $0.17/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5.1 and Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic and Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons