Claude Fable 5.1 vs o4-mini
Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.8 to 27.9. o4-mini is 10.4x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.8 to 27.9, ranking #5 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Fable 5.1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, o4-mini is roughly 10.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Fable 5.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Fable 5.1
- overall performance matters — it scores 54.8 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose o4-mini
- cost matters — it's about 10.4x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 14 for o4-mini
Claude Fable 5.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while o4-mini is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Fable 5.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 9.1x more expensive than o4-mini ($1.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 11.4x more expensive than o4-mini ($4.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Fable 5.1 is more expensive than o4-mini.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Fable 5.1 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to o4-mini's 200,000 tokens. Claude Fable 5.1 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while o4-mini is limited to 100,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Fable 5.1 and o4-mini support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Fable 5.1
o4-mini
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while o4-mini was released on 2025-04-16.
Claude Fable 5.1 is 17 months newer than o4-mini.
Sep 1, 2026
1 days ago
1.4yr newerApr 16, 2025
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
o4-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Claude Fable 5.1's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm o4-mini's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Fable 5.1's cutoff date.
—
May 2024
Provider Availability
Claude Fable 5.1 is available from Anthropic. o4-mini is available from OpenAI.
Claude Fable 5.1
o4-mini
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and o4-mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs o4-mini.