The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 56.3 to 33.0. Qwen3 Max Thinking is 8.3x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 56.3 to 33.0, ranking #2 overall.

On price, Qwen3 Max Thinking is roughly 8.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Fable 5.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 56.3 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3 Max Thinking

  • cost matters — it's about 8.3x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
56.3
#2
33.0
#101
Reasoning
53.3
#5
34.1
#90
Coding
35.0
#29
16.4
#124
Agents
41.9
#2
10.3
#115
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$10.00 / M
$1.20 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Fable 5.1
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Tool use
30.5#15
3.5#161
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 34 for Qwen3 Max Thinking

No common benchmarks found

Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 Max Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 Max Thinking costs less

For input processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Qwen3 Max Thinking ($1.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Qwen3 Max Thinking ($6.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Fable 5.1 is more expensive than Qwen3 Max Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input tokens$1.20
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Fable 5.1 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 Max Thinking's 256,000 tokens. Qwen3 Max Thinking can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Claude Fable 5.1 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Fable 5.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 Max Thinking does not.

Claude Fable 5.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Fable 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 Max Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Fable 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 Max Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Qwen3 Max Thinking was released on 2026-02-13.

Claude Fable 5.1 is 7 months newer than Qwen3 Max Thinking.

Claude Fable 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

1 weeks ago

6mo newer
Qwen3 Max Thinking

Feb 13, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Fable 5.1 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3 Max Thinking is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Fable 5.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Qwen3 Max Thinking

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 Max Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5.1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3 Max Thinking.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3 Max Thinking?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 56.3 to 33.0. Claude Fable 5.1 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3 Max Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Fable 5.1 compare to Qwen3 Max Thinking in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores OSWorld 2.0: 77.9%, CursorBench v3.2: 73.4%, Humanity's Last Exam: 65.0%, GDPval-AA: 61.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 55.8%. Qwen3 Max Thinking scores C-Eval: 93.7%, IFEval: 93.4%, AIME 2026: 93.3%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, GPQA: 87.4%.

Is Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper than Qwen3 Max Thinking?

Qwen3 Max Thinking is 8.3x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3 Max Thinking costs $1.20/M input and $6.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 Max Thinking?

Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 Max Thinking supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 Max Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (56.3 vs 33.0), context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($10.00 vs $1.20/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 Max Thinking?

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3 Max Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons