The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Sarvam-105B

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 56.8 to 25.9.

Anthropic · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 56.8 to 25.9, ranking #2 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Fable 5.1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 56.8 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
Sarvam-105B
Sarvam AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
56.8
#2
25.9
#144
Reasoning
53.9
#5
26.4
#138
Coding
36.0
#23
-1.3
#238
Agents
41.9
#2
6.2
#133
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 14 for Sarvam-105B

1 shared

Claude Fable 5.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Sarvam-105B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Fable 5.1 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Fable 5.1 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Fable 5.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

Claude Fable 5.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Fable 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Fable 5.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Fable 5.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Claude Fable 5.1 is 6 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

Claude Fable 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

3 days ago

5mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5.1
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Sarvam-105B?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 56.8 to 25.9. Claude Fable 5.1 is made by Anthropic and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Fable 5.1 compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores OSWorld 2.0: 77.9%, CursorBench v3.2: 73.4%, Humanity's Last Exam: 65.0%, GDPval-AA: 61.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 55.8%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5.1 and Sarvam-105B?

Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5.1 and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (56.8 vs 25.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5.1 and Sarvam-105B?

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.

Related comparisons