The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Sarvam-105B

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 25.9.

Google · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 25.9, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Sarvam-105B
Sarvam AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.4
#46
25.9
#144
Coding
35.6
#25
-1.3
#238
Agents
31.2
#27
6.2
#133
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 14 for Sarvam-105B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Sarvam-105Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 6 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 days ago

6mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Sarvam-105B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 25.9. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.4 vs 25.9), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Sarvam-105B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.

Related comparisons