The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Grok-4 Heavy

Claude Fable 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 61.3 to 40.1.

Anthropic · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 61.3 to 40.1, ranking #1 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Fable 5.2 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 61.3 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Grok-4 Heavy

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
61.3
#1
40.1
#82
60.3
#1
38.5
#83
50.7
#1
17.6
#147
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Fable 5.2
Grok-4 Heavy
46.8#2
41.6#11
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

29 reported for Claude Fable 5.2 · 6 for Grok-4 Heavy

1 shared

Claude Fable 5.2 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Grok-4 Heavy is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Nov 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Fable 5.2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Fable 5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Nov 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Fable 5.2 and Grok-4 Heavy support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Fable 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Fable 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Fable 5.2's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

Claude Fable 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

0 days ago

Grok-4 Heavy

—

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Fable 5.2 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Grok-4 Heavy has a cutoff of 2024-12-31.

Claude Fable 5.2 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Grok-4 Heavy (2024-12-31).

Claude Fable 5.2

Jun 2026

1.5 yr newer
Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.2 and Grok-4 Heavy side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5.2
✓ Preferred
Grok-4 Heavy
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5.2 vs Grok-4 Heavy.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.2 or Grok-4 Heavy?

Claude Fable 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 61.3 to 40.1. Claude Fable 5.2 is made by Anthropic and Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Fable 5.2 compare to Grok-4 Heavy in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5.2 scores SWE-bench Multilingual: 96.6%, Global-MMLU: 96.0%, MILU: 94.1%, SWE-Bench Pro: 93.0%, Chartography: 91.6%. Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5.2 and Grok-4 Heavy?

Claude Fable 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5.2 and Grok-4 Heavy?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (61.3 vs 40.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5.2 and Grok-4 Heavy?

Claude Fable 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI.