The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen4-Max-Preview

Comparing Claude Fable 5.2 and Qwen4-Max-Preview across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5.2 and Qwen4-Max-Preview trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5.2

  • you want predictable pricing at $8.00/M input and $40.00/M output

Choose Qwen4-Max-Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

29 reported for Claude Fable 5.2 · 0 for Qwen4-Max-Preview

No common benchmarks found

Claude Fable 5.2 and Qwen4-Max-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Fable 5.2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Fable 5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen4-Max-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Fable 5.2 and Qwen4-Max-Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Fable 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen4-Max-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Fable 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen4-Max-Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Qwen4-Max-Preview was released on 2026-11-11.

Qwen4-Max-Preview is 0 month newer than Claude Fable 5.2.

Claude Fable 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

Qwen4-Max-Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

2d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Fable 5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Qwen4-Max-Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Fable 5.2's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen4-Max-Preview's cutoff date.

Claude Fable 5.2

Jun 2026

Qwen4-Max-Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.2 and Qwen4-Max-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5.2
✓ Preferred
Qwen4-Max-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen4-Max-Preview.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.2 or Qwen4-Max-Preview?

Claude Fable 5.2 (Anthropic) and Qwen4-Max-Preview (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Fable 5.2 compare to Qwen4-Max-Preview in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5.2 scores SWE-bench Multilingual: 96.6%, Global-MMLU: 96.0%, MILU: 94.1%, SWE-Bench Pro: 93.0%, Chartography: 91.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5.2 and Qwen4-Max-Preview?

Claude Fable 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen4-Max-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Claude Fable 5.2 and Qwen4-Max-Preview?

Claude Fable 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen4-Max-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.