The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Claude Fable 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 53.1 to 29.9.

Anthropic · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 53.1 to 29.9, ranking #10 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Fable 5 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 53.1 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
53.1
#10
29.9
#142
Reasoning
51.1
#10
29.2
#143
Coding
42.7
#5
14.8
#151
Agents
38.7
#8
12.4
#124
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude Fable 5
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Math
41.7#7
23.6#135
Tool use
23.9#42
5.6#168
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Claude Fable 5 · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

2 shared

Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Fable 5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Fable 5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Fable 5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Fable 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Fable 5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Fable 5

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5 was released on 2026-06-09, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 4 months newer than Claude Fable 5.

Claude Fable 5

Jun 9, 2026

4 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

2 days ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while Claude Fable 5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Fable 5's cutoff date.

Claude Fable 5

—

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Claude Fable 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 53.1 to 29.9. Claude Fable 5 is made by Anthropic and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Fable 5 compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 95.0%, FrontierSWE: 90.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 85.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 84.3%, SWE-Bench Pro: 80.0%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Claude Fable 5 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (53.1 vs 29.9), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons