The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Claude Fable 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.9 to 43.3. Qwen3.7-Plus is 35.7x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.9 to 43.3, ranking #4 overall.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Fable 5 wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3.7-Plus is roughly 35.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.9 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 6 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus

  • cost matters — it's about 35.7x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
Qwen3.7-Plus
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.9
#4
43.3
#36
Reasoning
53.3
#6
43.6
#33
Coding
48.7
#2
32.5
#41
Agents
42.5
#2
26.1
#39
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
6 of 6
0 of 6
Input price
$10.00 / M
$0.32 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$1.28 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Claude Fable 5
Qwen3.7-Plus
Math
41.8#7
39.7#17
Vision
37.0#7
32.8#17
Tool use
25.1#29
24.3#33
Multimodal
31.8#18
35.2#9
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Claude Fable 5 · 70 for Qwen3.7-Plus

6 shared

Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (Finance Agent v2, FrontierCode 1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, OSWorld-Verified, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified), while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.7-Plus costs less

For input processing, Claude Fable 5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 31.3x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Fable 5 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 39.1x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Fable 5 is more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input tokens$0.32
Output tokens$1.28
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Fable 5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3.7-Plus is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Fable 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Fable 5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5 was released on 2026-06-09, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.

Claude Fable 5 is 0 month newer than Qwen3.7-Plus.

Claude Fable 5

Jun 9, 2026

2 months ago

1w newer
Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Fable 5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together, Fireworks.

Claude Fable 5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Qwen3.7-Plus

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.28/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7-Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7-Plus.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Claude Fable 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.9 to 43.3. Claude Fable 5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Fable 5 compare to Qwen3.7-Plus in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 95.0%, FrontierSWE: 90.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 85.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 84.3%, SWE-Bench Pro: 80.0%. Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%.

Is Claude Fable 5 cheaper than Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus is 31.3x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3.7-Plus costs $0.32/M input and $1.28/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Claude Fable 5 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.9 vs 43.3), input pricing ($10.00 vs $0.32/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons