The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3

Claude Fable 5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is 9.3x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Zhipu AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, ExploitBench, FrontierSWE, Humanity's Last Exam), while GLM-5.3 is better at 2 benchmarks (AutomationBench, Terminal-Bench 2.1). Claude Fable 5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, GLM-5.3 is roughly 9.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Fable 5

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks

Choose GLM-5.3

  • cost matters — it's about 9.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
4 of 6
2 of 6
Input price
$10.00 / M
$1.40 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$4.40 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,000,000
Released
Jun 2026
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Unknown

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, ExploitBench, FrontierSWE, Humanity's Last Exam), while GLM-5.3 is better at 2 benchmarks (AutomationBench, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

Claude Fable 5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5.3 costs less

For input processing, Claude Fable 5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 7.1x more expensive than GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Fable 5 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 11.4x more expensive than GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Fable 5 is more expensive than GLM-5.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Fable 5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

Claude Fable 5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Fable 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Fable 5 was released on 2026-06-09, while GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14.

GLM-5.3 is 2 months newer than Claude Fable 5.

Claude Fable 5

Jun 9, 2026

2 months ago

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Fable 5 is available from Anthropic. GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI.

Claude Fable 5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Fable 5
✓ Preferred
GLM-5.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.3?

Claude Fable 5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude Fable 5 is made by Anthropic and GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Fable 5 compare to GLM-5.3 in benchmarks?

Claude Fable 5 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 95.0%, FrontierSWE: 90.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 85.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 84.3%, SWE-Bench Pro: 80.0%. GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%.

Is Claude Fable 5 cheaper than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is 7.1x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.3?

Claude Fable 5 supports 1.0M tokens and GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.3?

Key differences include input pricing ($10.00 vs $1.40/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.3?

Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic and GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI.