Model Comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

Claude Haiku 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OSWorld), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA). Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2025

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OSWorld), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Jul 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 4.5 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Jul 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is 1 month newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

9 months ago

3w newer
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher OSWorld score (50.7% vs 41.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (83.7% vs 80.7%)
Higher GPQA score (73.1% vs 73.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 4.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores Tau2 Retail: 83.2%, MMMLU: 83.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 83.0%, AIME 2025: 80.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.3%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons