Model Comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 3.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, OSWorld), while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 5.6x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($0.18/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 2.4x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($2.09/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input tokens$1.00

Output tokens$5.00

Best providerAnthropic

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Input tokens$0.18

Output tokens$2.09

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input200,000 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is 1 month newer than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

6 months ago

3w newer

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.09/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Haiku 4.5

View details

Anthropic

Higher AIME 2025 score (80.7% vs 80.3%)

Higher GPQA score (73.0% vs 69.9%)

Higher OSWorld score (50.7% vs 33.9%)

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Haiku 4.5	Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores Tau2 Retail: 83.2%, MMMLU: 83.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 83.0%, AIME 2025: 80.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.3%. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 93.6%, MMLU-Redux: 88.8%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.5%, InfoVQAtest: 86.0%.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 5.6x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking costs $0.18/M input and $2.09/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 262K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.18/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.