Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ember-1
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ember-1 are closely matched at 50.3 and 43.6 on the LLM Stats Score. Claude Haiku 5.5 is 30.0x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Fireworks AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ember-1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 50.3 and 43.6.
On price, Claude Haiku 5.5 is roughly 30.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Ember-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5
- cost matters — it's about 30.0x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Ember-1
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 4 for Ember-1
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ember-1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 30.0x cheaper than Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 30.0x cheaper than Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than Claude Haiku 5.5.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Ember-1 accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to Claude Haiku 5.5's 1,000,000 tokens. Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude Haiku 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.
Claude Haiku 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Ember-1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is 0 month newer than Ember-1.
Oct 7, 2026
0 days ago
2w newerSep 23, 2026
2 weeks ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Ember-1's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ember-1's cutoff date.
Jun 2026
—
Provider Availability
Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Ember-1 is available from Fireworks.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Ember-1
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ember-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ember-1.