Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to -0.8. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 1.6x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to -0.8, ranking #19 overall.
On price, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5
- overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
- cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 13 for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Haiku 5.5 is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Haiku 5.5's 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is 31 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.
Oct 7, 2026
1 days ago
2.6yr newerMar 15, 2024
2.6 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a cutoff of 2024-10-01.
Claude Haiku 5.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (2024-10-01).
Jun 2026
1.7 yr newerOct 2024
Provider Availability
Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.