The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 3 4B

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to -1.9. Gemma 3 4B is 8.0x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to -1.9, ranking #19 overall.

On price, Gemma 3 4B is roughly 8.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Haiku 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • cost matters — it's about 8.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
Gemma 3 4B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.0
#19
-1.9
#353
Reasoning
47.2
#27
-2.9
#350
Coding
40.2
#13
-4.4
#270
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.02 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$0.04 / M
Context window
1,000,000
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
Gemma 3 4B
Math
25.7#110
5.0#281
Vision
30.4#33
-11.8#218
Multimodal
31.4#27
-9.6#179
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 26 for Gemma 3 4B

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3 4Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 5.5 is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 4B's 131,072 tokens. Gemma 3 4B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Haiku 5.5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3 4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3 4B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 19 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

1 days ago

1.6yr newer
Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemma 3 4B has a cutoff of 2024-08-01.

Claude Haiku 5.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3 4B (2024-08-01).

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

1.8 yr newer
Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Haiku 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3 4B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 3 4B.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 3 4B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to -1.9. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3 4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Gemma 3 4B in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 3 4B is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via anthropic. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3 4B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3 4B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs -1.9), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.02/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3 4B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons