The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 3n E2B

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.1 to -10.2.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.1 to -10.2, ranking #18 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.1 and ranks #18 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E2B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
Gemma 3n E2B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.1
#18
-10.2
#382
Reasoning
47.4
#25
-10.4
#375
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
Gemma 3n E2B
Math
25.7#110
-6.3#326
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 11 for Gemma 3n E2B

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3n E2Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3n E2B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

4 days ago

1.3yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemma 3n E2B has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Claude Haiku 5.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B (2024-06-01).

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

2 yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3n E2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 3n E2B.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 3n E2B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.1 to -10.2. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Gemma 3n E2B in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3n E2B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E2B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3n E2B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.1 vs -10.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3n E2B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons