The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT OSS 20B High

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 27.6. Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT OSS 20B High cost the same.

Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 27.6, ranking #19 overall.

Claude Haiku 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose GPT OSS 20B High

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
50.0
#19
27.6
#156
47.2
#27
27.7
#148
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
1,000,000
131,072

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 2 for GPT OSS 20B High

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT OSS 20B Highdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as GPT OSS 20B High ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) costs the same as GPT OSS 20B High ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT OSS 20B High cost the same.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B High
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 20B High's 131,072 tokens. GPT OSS 20B High can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Haiku 5.5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B High
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Oct 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 20B High does not.

Claude Haiku 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT OSS 20B High

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GPT OSS 20B High uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT OSS 20B High

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while GPT OSS 20B High was released on 2025-08-05.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 14 months newer than GPT OSS 20B High.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

1 days ago

1.2yr newer
GPT OSS 20B High

Aug 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while GPT OSS 20B High's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT OSS 20B High's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

GPT OSS 20B High

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. GPT OSS 20B High is available from OpenAI.

Claude Haiku 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

GPT OSS 20B High

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT OSS 20B High side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
GPT OSS 20B High
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT OSS 20B High.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT OSS 20B High?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 27.6. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and GPT OSS 20B High is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to GPT OSS 20B High in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. GPT OSS 20B High scores AIME 2025: 98.7%, GPQA: 74.2%.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than GPT OSS 20B High?

Both models cost $0.10 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT OSS 20B High?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT OSS 20B High supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT OSS 20B High?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs 27.6), context window (1.0M vs 131K), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT OSS 20B High?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and GPT OSS 20B High is developed by OpenAI.