The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to -5.5.

Anthropic · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to -5.5, ranking #19 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.0
#19
-5.5
#374
Reasoning
47.2
#27
-5.5
#364
Coding
40.2
#13
2.9
#234
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Math
25.7#110
-5.8#324
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Claude Haiku 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 17 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

0 days ago

1.4yr newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to -5.5. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs -5.5), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons