The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Hy4 preview

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Hy4 preview are closely matched at 50.1 and 49.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Hy4 preview are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 50.1 and 49.9.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Haiku 5.5 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Hy4 preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
50.1
#18
49.9
#20
47.4
#25
49.9
#14
40.0
#12
37.8
#21
33.6
#29
34.9
#22
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 5
2 of 5
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
Hy4 preview
25.7#110
38.7#24
20.7#56
28.0#22
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 32 for Hy4 preview

5 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam (no tools, text-only), Program Bench, SWE-bench Multilingual), while Hy4 preview is better at 2 benchmarks (OfficeQA Pro, SWE-Bench Pro).

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Sat Oct 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tencent
Hy4 preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

Claude Haiku 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hy4 preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 1 month newer than Hy4 preview.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

4 days ago

1mo newer
Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Hy4 preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy4 preview's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

Hy4 preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Hy4 preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Hy4 preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Hy4 preview.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Hy4 preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Hy4 preview are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 50.1 and 49.9. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Hy4 preview is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Hy4 preview in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Hy4 preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Hy4 preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Hy4 preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.1 vs 49.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Hy4 preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent.