The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.1 to 11.2. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 2.0x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.1 to 11.2, ranking #18 overall.

On price, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Haiku 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.1 and ranks #18 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

  • cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.1
#18
11.2
#275
Reasoning
47.4
#25
11.4
#270
Coding
40.0
#12
6.8
#201
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$0.10 / M
Context window
1,000,000
131,100

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Math
25.7#110
12.8#238
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 4 for Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 5.5 is more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Oct 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerAnthropic
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s 131,100 tokens. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can generate longer responses up to 131,100 tokens, while Claude Haiku 5.5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Wed Oct 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 10 months newer than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

6 days ago

10mo newer
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is available from Mistral AI.

Claude Haiku 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.1 to 11.2. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Both models cost $0.10 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.1 vs 11.2), context window (1.0M vs 131K), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons