The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.3 to -0.3.

Anthropic · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.3 to -0.3, ranking #18 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.3 and ranks #18 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Mistral Small 3 24B Base

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.3
#18
-0.3
#342
Reasoning
47.4
#26
-0.3
#336
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Math
25.7#110
4.5#286
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 9 for Mistral Small 3 24B Base

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Small 3 24B Basedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Small 3 24B Base support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base was released on 2025-01-30.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 21 months newer than Mistral Small 3 24B Base.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

0 days ago

1.7yr newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Jan 30, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

Claude Haiku 5.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Base (2023-10-01).

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

2.7 yr newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Small 3 24B Base side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.3 to -0.3. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Mistral Small 3 24B Base in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. Mistral Small 3 24B Base scores ARC-C: 91.3%, GSM8k: 80.7%, MMLU: 80.7%, TriviaQA: 80.3%, MBPP: 69.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.3 vs -0.3), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons