The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs QvQ-72B-Preview

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 7.8.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 7.8, ranking #19 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
50.0
#19
7.8
#298
47.2
#27
8.2
#291
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
QvQ-72B-Preview
25.7#110
9.6#259
30.4#33
6.2#157
31.4#27
9.5#129
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and QvQ-72B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and QvQ-72B-Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 22 months newer than QvQ-72B-Preview.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

0 days ago

1.8yr newer
QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while QvQ-72B-Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without QvQ-72B-Preview's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

QvQ-72B-Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or QvQ-72B-Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 7.8. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and QvQ-72B-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs 7.8), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.