The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are closely matched at 50.0 and 37.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 50.0 and 37.8.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.0
#19
37.8
#79
Reasoning
47.2
#27
32.2
#117
Agents
33.3
#28
21.0
#73
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 5 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash was released on 2026-09-18.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 1 month newer than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

1 days ago

2w newer
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Sep 18, 2026

2 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.8 Omni Flash's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 50.0 and 37.8. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Qwen3.8 Omni Flash in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash scores VoiceBench Avg: 91.6%, DailyOmni: 85.1%, MMAU: 81.8%, OmniGAIA: 74.0%, WildClawBench: 71.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs 37.8). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons