The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 45.1 and 43.3 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 222.2x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 45.1 and 43.3.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 222.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Mythos 5.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.1

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • cost matters — it's about 222.2x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.1
#31
43.3
#39
Reasoning
44.4
#34
44.7
#32
Agents
34.5
#21
29.5
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$10.00 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
1,000,000
262,144

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Claude Mythos 5.1 · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Claude Mythos 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 166.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Mythos 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 277.8x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Mythos 5.1 is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerAnthropic
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Mythos 5.1 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude Mythos 5.1 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Mythos 5.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Claude Mythos 5.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 0 month newer than Claude Mythos 5.1.

Claude Mythos 5.1

Sep 1, 2026

1 weeks ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

5 days ago

2d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Mythos 5.1 is available from Anthropic. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Mythos 5.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.1
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Claude Mythos 5.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 45.1 and 43.3. Claude Mythos 5.1 is made by Anthropic and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.1 compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.1 scores Terminal-Bench 4.0: 60.9%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is Claude Mythos 5.1 cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 166.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Mythos 5.1 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via anthropic. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.1 vs 43.3), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($10.00 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Claude Mythos 5.1 is developed by Anthropic and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons