The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 16.1.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 16.1, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.2
Anthropic
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.6
#2
16.1
#262
Reasoning
53.3
#8
16.4
#254
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude Mythos 5.2 · 3 for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21.

Claude Mythos 5.2 is 22 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

0 days ago

1.8yr newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Mythos 5.2 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a cutoff of 2024-08-01.

Claude Mythos 5.2 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (2024-08-01).

Claude Mythos 5.2

Jun 2026

1.8 yr newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.2
✓ Preferred
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.2 or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 16.1. Claude Mythos 5.2 is made by Anthropic and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.2 compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.2 scores De novo protein binder design: 85.1%, Biomedical image analysis: 80.7%, Protocols Troubleshooting: 77.1%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 75.3%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.5%. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.6 vs 16.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Claude Mythos 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google.

Related comparisons