Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 42.7. Gemini 3.1 Pro is 3.6x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 42.7, ranking #2 overall.
On price, Gemini 3.1 Pro is roughly 3.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Mythos 5.2
- overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro
- cost matters — it's about 3.6x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
9 reported for Claude Mythos 5.2 · 21 for Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemini 3.1 Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Mythos 5.2 ($8.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Mythos 5.2 ($40.00/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Mythos 5.2 is more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Claude Mythos 5.2 is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemini 3.1 Pro support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Mythos 5.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Mythos 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19.
Claude Mythos 5.2 is 9 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Nov 9, 2026
0 days ago
8mo newerFeb 19, 2026
8 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Mythos 5.2 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemini 3.1 Pro has a cutoff of 2025-01-31.
Claude Mythos 5.2 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro (2025-01-31).
Jun 2026
1.4 yr newerJan 2025
Provider Availability
Claude Mythos 5.2 is available from Anthropic. Gemini 3.1 Pro is available from DeepInfra, Google.
Claude Mythos 5.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemini 3.1 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro.