The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Gemma 2 27B

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to -1.2.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to -1.2, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Gemma 2 27B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.2
Anthropic
Gemma 2 27B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.6
#2
-1.2
#375
Reasoning
53.3
#8
-1.6
#370
Coding
45.1
#5
-8.0
#303
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude Mythos 5.2 · 16 for Gemma 2 27B

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemma 2 27Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

Claude Mythos 5.2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Mythos 5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 2 27B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27.

Claude Mythos 5.2 is 29 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

0 days ago

2.4yr newer
Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Mythos 5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Mythos 5.2's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Jun 2026

Gemma 2 27B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemma 2 27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.2
✓ Preferred
Gemma 2 27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Gemma 2 27B.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.2 or Gemma 2 27B?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to -1.2. Claude Mythos 5.2 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 2 27B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.2 compare to Gemma 2 27B in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.2 scores De novo protein binder design: 85.1%, Biomedical image analysis: 80.7%, Protocols Troubleshooting: 77.1%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 75.3%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.5%. Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemma 2 27B?

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemma 2 27B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.6 vs -1.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.2 and Gemma 2 27B?

Claude Mythos 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons