The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Muse Glimmer-30B

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 34.7. Muse Glimmer-30B is 30.5x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 34.7, ranking #2 overall.

On price, Muse Glimmer-30B is roughly 30.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Mythos 5.2 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • cost matters — it's about 30.5x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.2
Anthropic
Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.6
#2
34.7
#117
Reasoning
53.3
#8
34.2
#113
Coding
45.1
#5
22.7
#104
Agents
44.6
#2
16.6
#110
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$8.00 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,000,000
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude Mythos 5.2
Muse Glimmer-30B
Vision
31.5#33
20.3#92
Tool use
38.0#1
19.5#83
Multimodal
31.7#29
23.3#76
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude Mythos 5.2 · 32 for Muse Glimmer-30B

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Glimmer-30Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Glimmer-30B costs less

For input processing, Claude Mythos 5.2 ($8.00/1M tokens) is 26.7x more expensive than Muse Glimmer-30B ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Mythos 5.2 ($40.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Muse Glimmer-30B ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Mythos 5.2 is more expensive than Muse Glimmer-30B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input tokens$8.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerAnthropic
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Mythos 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Muse Glimmer-30B's 131,072 tokens. Muse Glimmer-30B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Mythos 5.2 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Glimmer-30B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Mythos 5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Glimmer-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.

Claude Mythos 5.2 is 3 months newer than Muse Glimmer-30B.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

0 days ago

3mo newer
Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Mythos 5.2 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Muse Glimmer-30B has a cutoff of 2026-01-04.

Claude Mythos 5.2 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Muse Glimmer-30B (2026-01-04).

Claude Mythos 5.2

Jun 2026

5 mo newer
Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Provider Availability

Claude Mythos 5.2 is available from Anthropic. Muse Glimmer-30B is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Mythos 5.2

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $8.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M

Muse Glimmer-30B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.2
✓ Preferred
Muse Glimmer-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Muse Glimmer-30B.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.2 or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 34.7. Claude Mythos 5.2 is made by Anthropic and Muse Glimmer-30B is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.2 compare to Muse Glimmer-30B in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.2 scores De novo protein binder design: 85.1%, Biomedical image analysis: 80.7%, Protocols Troubleshooting: 77.1%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 75.3%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.5%. Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, Tau2 Telecom: 94.1%, PinchBench: 90.5%, Tau2 Retail: 87.1%.

Is Claude Mythos 5.2 cheaper than Muse Glimmer-30B?

Muse Glimmer-30B is 26.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Mythos 5.2 costs $8.00/M input and $40.00/M output via anthropic. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.6 vs 34.7), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($8.00 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.2 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Claude Mythos 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons