The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.2 vs North Micro Vision Instruct

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to -5.8.

Anthropic · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to -5.8, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose North Micro Vision Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.2
Anthropic
North Micro Vision Instruct
Cohere
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.6
#2
-5.8
#403
Reasoning
53.6
#7
-8.3
#402
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude Mythos 5.2
North Micro Vision Instruct
Vision
31.2#36
-5.3#235
Multimodal
31.1#35
-3.6#191
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude Mythos 5.2 · 19 for North Micro Vision Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.2 and North Micro Vision Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Cohere
North Micro Vision Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Nov 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Mythos 5.2 and North Micro Vision Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

North Micro Vision Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Mythos 5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while North Micro Vision Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

North Micro Vision Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while North Micro Vision Instruct was released on 2026-08-12.

Claude Mythos 5.2 is 3 months newer than North Micro Vision Instruct.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

5 days ago

2mo newer
North Micro Vision Instruct

Aug 12, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Mythos 5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while North Micro Vision Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Mythos 5.2's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without North Micro Vision Instruct's cutoff date.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Jun 2026

North Micro Vision Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.2 and North Micro Vision Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.2
✓ Preferred
North Micro Vision Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.2 vs North Micro Vision Instruct.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.2 or North Micro Vision Instruct?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to -5.8. Claude Mythos 5.2 is made by Anthropic and North Micro Vision Instruct is made by Cohere. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.2 compare to North Micro Vision Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.2 scores De novo protein binder design: 85.1%, Biomedical image analysis: 80.7%, Protocols Troubleshooting: 77.1%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 75.3%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.5%. North Micro Vision Instruct scores DocVQA: 92.1%, ChartQA: 80.8%, OCRBench: 79.2%, AI2D: 77.5%, IFEval: 74.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.2 and North Micro Vision Instruct?

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and North Micro Vision Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.2 and North Micro Vision Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.6 vs -5.8), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.2 and North Micro Vision Instruct?

Claude Mythos 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and North Micro Vision Instruct is developed by Cohere.

Related comparisons