The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4 are closely matched at 29.5 and 27.4 on the LLM Stats Score. Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4 cost the same.

Anthropic · Anthropic · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 29.5 and 27.4.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 7; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4.1

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 7 of 8 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

Choose Claude Opus 4

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
29.5
#147
27.4
#164
29.6
#143
27.4
#158
21.3
#106
17.3
#141
12.7
#121
8.0
#156
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
7 of 8
1 of 8
Input price
$15.00 / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
$75.00 / M
Context window
200,000
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4
22.6#146
20.3#170
18.2#84
19.1#78
19.0#25
20.0#18
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for Claude Opus 4.1 · 9 for Claude Opus 4

8 shared

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMMLU, MMMU (validation), SWE-Bench Verified, TAU-bench Retail, Terminal-Bench), while Claude Opus 4 is better at 1 benchmark (TAU-bench Airline).

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens) costs the same as Claude Opus 4 ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens) costs the same as Claude Opus 4 ($75.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4 cost the same.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 32,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Opus 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude Opus 4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22.

Claude Opus 4.1 is 3 months newer than Claude Opus 4.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

2mo newer
Claude Opus 4

May 22, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Claude Opus 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

Claude Opus 4.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Claude Opus 4

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.1
✓ Preferred
Claude Opus 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Opus 4?

Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 29.5 and 27.4. Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic and Claude Opus 4 is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 4.1 compare to Claude Opus 4 in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. Claude Opus 4 scores MMMLU: 88.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.4%, GPQA: 79.6%, MMMU (validation): 76.5%, AIME 2025: 75.5%.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 cheaper than Claude Opus 4?

Both models cost $15.00 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and Claude Opus 4 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.5 vs 27.4). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.