The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4.1

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—
Released
Aug 2025
May 2025
License
Proprietary
Gemma

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4.1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4.1 specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Claude Opus 4.1 is 3 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.1

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.1
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.1 compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google.

Related comparisons