The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—
Released
May 2025
Aug 2026
License
Gemma
Qwen Community License 1.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

123.1B diff

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has 123.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 6444.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 15 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

0 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons