Claude Opus 4.1 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni are closely matched at 29.8 and 27.4 on the LLM Stats Score. MiMo-V2-Omni is 37.5x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 29.8 and 27.4.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2-Omni wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, MiMo-V2-Omni is roughly 37.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2-Omni also accepts a larger context window (262,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Opus 4.1
- you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output
Choose MiMo-V2-Omni
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 37.5x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
8 reported for Claude Opus 4.1 · 5 for MiMo-V2-Omni
Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2-Omni is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Verified).
MiMo-V2-Omni significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($0.40/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($2.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2-Omni accepts 262,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.1's 200,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Omni is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4.1
MiMo-V2-Omni
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while MiMo-V2-Omni was released on 2026-03-18.
MiMo-V2-Omni is 8 months newer than Claude Opus 4.1.
Aug 5, 2025
1.2 years ago
Mar 18, 2026
6 months ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. MiMo-V2-Omni is available from Xiaomi.
Claude Opus 4.1
MiMo-V2-Omni
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs MiMo-V2-Omni.