Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4o mini

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o mini is 114.3x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-4o mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Jun 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4o mini costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 100.0x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 125.0x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4 is more expensive than GPT-4o mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Jun 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4 can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Thu Jun 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4 and GPT-4o mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18.

Claude Opus 4 is 10 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

Claude Opus 4

May 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

10mo newer
GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Claude Opus 4's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4

—

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT-4o mini is available from Azure.

Claude Opus 4

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (79.6% vs 40.2%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (72.5% vs 8.7%)
OpenAI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
AnthropicClaude Opus 4
OpenAIGPT-4o mini
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4o mini.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or GPT-4o mini?

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4 is made by Anthropic and GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4 compare to GPT-4o mini in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4 scores MMMLU: 88.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.4%, GPQA: 79.6%, MMMU (validation): 76.5%, AIME 2025: 75.5%. GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%.

Is Claude Opus 4 cheaper than GPT-4o mini?

GPT-4o mini is 100.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4 and GPT-4o mini?

Claude Opus 4 supports 200K tokens and GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4 and GPT-4o mini?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4 and GPT-4o mini?

Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic and GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI.