The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 4 vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Claude Opus 4 leads the LLM Stats Score 27.7 to 7.2.

Anthropic · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 4 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 27.7 to 7.2, ranking #142 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 4 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4

  • overall performance matters — it scores 27.7 and ranks #142 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
27.7
#142
7.2
#292
27.7
#134
7.5
#282
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude Opus 4 · 3 for Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

1 shared

Claude Opus 4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4 specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini Reasoning does not.

Claude Opus 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Claude Opus 4 is 1 month newer than Phi 4 Mini Reasoning.

Claude Opus 4

May 22, 2025

1.3 years ago

3w newer
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Claude Opus 4's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Feb 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4 and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4 vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Claude Opus 4 leads the LLM Stats Score 27.7 to 7.2. Claude Opus 4 is made by Anthropic and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 4 compare to Phi 4 Mini Reasoning in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4 scores MMMLU: 88.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.4%, GPQA: 79.6%, MMMU (validation): 76.5%, AIME 2025: 75.5%. Phi 4 Mini Reasoning scores MATH-500: 94.6%, AIME: 57.5%, GPQA: 52.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4 and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Claude Opus 4 supports 200K tokens and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4 and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (27.7 vs 7.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4 and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.