Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BWhich is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 74.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is roughly 74.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 4.5 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 74.1x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 41.7x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 138.9x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input tokens$0.12
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

Claude Opus 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20.

Claude Opus 4.5 is 10 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

6 months ago

10mo newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

—

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.12/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (87.0% vs 62.1%)
DeepSeek
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 41.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.5 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.12/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek.

Related comparisons