Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Pro
Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3 Pro are closely matched at 38.5 and 38.7 on the LLM Stats Score. Gemini 3 Pro is 2.2x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3 Pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 38.5 and 38.7.
In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 4.5 wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemini 3 Pro is roughly 2.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025
Choose Gemini 3 Pro
- cost matters — it's about 2.2x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Claude Opus 4.5 · 21 for Gemini 3 Pro
Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (ARC-AGI v2, LiveBench, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Gemini 3 Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU).
Claude Opus 4.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Gemini 3 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 2.1x more expensive than Gemini 3 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Gemini 3 Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Pro can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3 Pro support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4.5
Gemini 3 Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18.
Claude Opus 4.5 is 0 month newer than Gemini 3 Pro.
Nov 24, 2025
9 months ago
6d newerNov 18, 2025
9 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Opus 4.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Gemini 3 Pro has a cutoff of 2025-01-31.
Claude Opus 4.5 has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3 Pro (2025-01-31).
Mar 2025
2 mo newerJan 2025
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Gemini 3 Pro is available from Google.
Claude Opus 4.5
Gemini 3 Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Pro.