Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 38.4. Gemini 3.8 Flash is 6.7x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 38.4, ranking #11 overall.
On price, Gemini 3.8 Flash is roughly 6.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.8 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5
- you want predictable pricing at $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output
Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 6.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Claude Opus 4.5 · 13 for Gemini 3.8 Flash
Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Gemini 3.8 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02.
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 9 months newer than Claude Opus 4.5.
Nov 24, 2025
9 months ago
Sep 2, 2026
0 days ago
9mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Opus 4.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Gemini 3.8 Flash has a cutoff of 2026-03-31.
Gemini 3.8 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Claude Opus 4.5 (2025-03-31).
Mar 2025
Mar 2026
1 yr newerProvider Availability
Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google.
Claude Opus 4.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash.