Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)Which is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4.5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4.5 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20.

Claude Opus 4.5 is 6 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

6 months ago

6mo newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Claude Opus 4.5 has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (2024-06-01).

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

9 mo newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (87.0% vs 24.8%)
Google
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google.

Related comparisons