The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Claude Opus 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.8 to -9.6.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.8 to -9.6, ranking #3 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 54.8 and ranks #3 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
54.8
#3
-9.6
#371
Reasoning
53.8
#4
-9.8
#364
Coding
41.0
#12
-4.4
#262
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$5.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$25.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Claude Opus 5 · 28 for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5 was released on 2026-07-24, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20.

Claude Opus 5 is 14 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Claude Opus 5

Jul 24, 2026

2 months ago

1.2yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude Opus 5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 5's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 5

—

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Which is better, Claude Opus 5 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Claude Opus 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.8 to -9.6. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5 compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5 scores BrowseComp: 90.8%, BioMysteryBench: 90.1%, OSWorld 2.0: 70.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 68.8%, Humanity's Last Exam: 64.7%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Claude Opus 5 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (54.8 vs -9.6), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Claude Opus 5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google.

Related comparisons