Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Gemma 3n E4B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025

Choose Gemma 3n E4B if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4.5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4.5 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26.

Claude Opus 4.5 is 5 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

6 months ago

5mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Gemma 3n E4B has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Claude Opus 4.5 has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B (2024-06-01).

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

9 mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Google
Gemma 3n E4B

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemma 3n E4B?

Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and Gemma 3n E4B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to Gemma 3n E4B in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%. Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons